Chupaqueso.com

« Toggle Left Sidebar Home Toggle Right Sidebar »

Previous: The Street Value of Uncut Cheese
Next: And Now, More Cheese

Cholesterocity

Posted December 14th, 2005 at 10:00 am by Howard Tayler

Six years ago, almost to the day, I had a heart attack. It wasn’t much of an attack, as cardiac events go — it was myocarditis, after all. It wasn’t caused by blockage, or high cholesterol, or high blood pressure, or any of the USUAL things that trigger arrests in 31-year-old males. I spent three days in the hospital being very bored (and a little scared, yes), and came home fit as a fiddle. Well… the strings needed to be tightened a bit, because the drugs they wanted me to take were worse than the myocarditis, but as soon as I ditched the battery of useless meds (including a blood-pressure regulator that prevented me from running up stairs, doing more than a couple of push-ups, or getting anything else up, if you catch my drift) I was fine.

They measured my cholesterol while I was in the hospital, and it was around 100. I was spectacularly healthy, and the ratio of HDL to LDL supported that. I’d been low-carb dieting at the time, and exercising upwards of 10 hours per week. Then I caught the “Luke Skywalker” flu — the virus made it all the way to the reactor core, and my heart muscle swelled up. That’s what myocarditis is: a viral or bacterial infection and resulting inflammation of the heart muscle.

Understand, though, that my Dad spent at least two decades being obese, had myocarditis in his 40’s, and then had a massive and quite fatal coronary at age 56. Regardless of how healthy I felt back in 1999, I also felt that there was this hereditary sword hanging over my head, and if I couldn’t move out of the way, perhaps I could put on a helmet.

So ever since 1999 I’ve been interested in my cholesterol levels. Some of you may remember the “guess Howard’s total cholesterol level” contest I ran for three or four years in a row each winter. Sadly, I’ve never dieted-and-exercised as effectively as I did back in 1999, so the levels have been as high as 235. Back when I was twenty-five years old I had my cholesterol measured, and it was around 200, maybe 205. The few times I’ve been tested while low-carbing, It’s been down around 150 to 175.

As far as I can tell, then, my cholesterol levels are high when I’m on the high-carb, high-junk, 21st-century fast-food-forager diet, and healthy or low when I’m doing some variant of the low-carb thing.

The latest round of results bear that out. I’ve been low-carbing, working out at least twice a week, and enjoying staple items like bacon-wrapped grilled chicken breast, butter-fried cheese, bacon and eggs, and ham-and-egg-drop soup for 16 days now. This morning I took a home cholesterol test, and was almost off the chart… on the low end. The chart only went down to “21 = 119″ (a reading of “21″ on the chart-calibrated device corresponds to a total cholesterol level of 119) and the fuzzy purple line generated by a few drops of my blood only went up to about 20.5. Eh. Call it 21. That puts my total cholesterol at or just south of 119, which is the lowest measurement I’ve had since 1999.

Needless to say, I’m pleased. My weight may have plateau’d for the last week, but I feel great, my clothing fits better, and now I know that my cholesterol has retreated from the borders of the Undiscovered Country.

Filed under Health and Fitness |
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.


4 Comments to “Cholesterocity”

  1. Comment @ 01/13/06 at 6:51 am

    I’m not a big hearlth worrier, but hit 33 and as a desk bound wage slave, my weight seams to go up each year. I keep hearing about “Low-Carb” and how great it is for loosing weight, but also how back it is for the body long term.

    You appear to have gone for “low-carb” from time to time, so you obviously rate it, but it sounds like death on a plate! Living on Fried Cheese and Bacon! EEP! Where do I find out honest and unbiased advice on this stuff?

  2. Comment @ 01/13/06 at 9:10 am

    There’s lots of good information on the web about low carb diets. There’s also lots of crap. Ultimately you’re going to have to make a judgement call, because our bodies are not all the same. Some people are very, very well-served by low-carb diets, and others are not. The only way to find out is to try it.

    Low carb need not mean “high fat.” Once you’re weaned of your dependency on simple sugars and starches, a low carb maintenance diet can be delivered with fresh vegetables, nuts, and the occasional whole-grain bread.

    I probably ought to do a post about low carbing, complete with links. In time I expect I will.

  3. Comment @ 01/13/06 at 11:00 am

    Now that WOULD be well recieved!

  4. Comment @ 03/05/07 at 9:08 pm

    I have this off the wall theory that I haven’t heard of anyone exploring. I’ve heard now of 2 separate people who have had myocarditis. Both of them were also on the low-carb diet. I’m curious as to if there’s any link, perhaps if low-carb might weaken something that keeps the pesky critters away from the core.

Leave Your Comment

Chupaqueso.com is proudly powered by WordPress. All content Copyright © 2006 Jay Maynard and Howard Tayler.
Theme by Howard Tayler and Ensellitis.com. Show/Hide script by Cross-Browser.com.

The Chupaqueso server fried up this page in 3.439 seconds.